To Circumcise or Not to Circumcise
Posted: Wednesday, November 30, 2005
by Sarah Veda
http://www.infantresources.com
If you’re about to have a baby, no doubt the subject of circumcision for a boy baby has entered your mind. Circumcision is a personal choice – but, of course, it’s one that you’re making for another person- so you tend to feel a fair amount of pressure to make a good decision. Here are some things to think about that might make your choice easier.
One thing to consider about circumcision – it is a decision you need to make early on. Part of the reason we chose not to have our younger son circumcised was the fact that, at ten months old, it would have been much more physically painful than if he had been circumcised as a newborn. I’m sure it’s no walk in the park at any age, but do realize that if you don’t have your son circumcised right away, it might not be wise to change your mind a few months down the road.
A final note about circumcision- not all penises are the same. Some boys have much more foreskin than others. If your son has only a small amount of foreskin, your doctor may refer to this as a “natural circumcision", and recommend that you not have a circumcision performed, unless it is for religious reasons. This means that your son’s foreskin is not likely to cause hygiene issues, nor will it be prone to infection, as are some uncircumcised penises.
It’s wise to talk to your doctor before you make a decision about circumcision. It’s a decision that you need to feel good about, and worth the time it takes to sort out the facts.
This Article has been viewed 1,687 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)Considering the amount and quality of information already available on this tender subject, this all too brief note by Sara Veda is sadly inadequate. It does confirm what many have come to suspect over the past 30 years: in the USA, the decision to circumcise or not does not come from the part of the mind that thinks scientifically. Rather, it is heavily driven by conformity and urban myths about the penis and sexual behavior. To circumcise a baby boy merely so that he won't be embarrassed when he and his father are both in a changing room, is pathetic. Incidentally, my father was cut, I am intact, and that fact went unremarked from my birth until his death.No nation does more reading and writing about the mechanics of sex than the USA. At the same time, no non-Moslem nation is more ignorant of the foreskin's contribution to those mechanics.It is not "better" to circumcise in the newborn period. Rather, we find it easier to ignore the protests of newborn baby than those of an older boy. The surgery is also trickier to carry out on the very young, because the foreskin has to be forcibly separated from the glans. It is also harder to judge how much to cut off in a baby than after the penis has attained its adult size.In my experience (I live outside the USA), nearly all intact boys look the same before puberty: they have long pointed foreskins. What varies is the age when they first can retract comfortably. This can happen as late as 18-20. It is the adult penis that varies in how much glans is displayed, with all degrees of coverage being normal. It is very difficult for Americans to appreciate the variety of intact penises, because porn shows the penis erect, and erect does not do justice to the foreskin. Straight porn seldom does justice to the mechanics of the foreskin. Gay porn is not something I know or want to talk about here.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.